your tax dollars at work

March 19, 2008 under BitTorrent, CBC, DRM

The CBC will become first of the major North American television networks to release content sans DRM. Indeed, you read that correctly.

The CBC will kick things off by releasing episodes of Canada’s Next Great Prime Minister the day after they air on TV. What I really admire about this plan is that the content will contain no DRM whatsoever (a la iTunes Music Store), so people are free to watch on whatever computer or device they wish. The icing on the cake is the fact that shows will be distributed via BitTorrent, which gives distribution power to the people. I would love it if they followed suit with some of their other shows like Air Farce, The Hour, The Mercer Report, This Hour Has 22 Minutes, Little Mosque on the Prairie or even jPod.

Actually, if we examine the CBC’s BitTorrent distrubution idea a little bit further, this is highlighting all of the right reasons for net neutrality. Putting this under a microscope yields:

  • BitTorrent is a highly efficient means to distribute digital data like software, music, video, photos, documents, etc.
  • BitTorrent, much to the chagrin of (mainly) the RIAA and MPAA, is a way to distribute copyrighted material.
  • It should be noted that BitTorrent is also used to distribute a lot of un-copyrighted material in an efficient and legal manner.
  • Due to the popularity of BitTorrent, pressure from copyright holders, and the bandwidth it consumes, major ISPs (in Canada’s case, that includes Rogers and Bell) shape network traffic such that BitTorrent traffic comes in like a trickle while other traffic (Web, email, instant messaging, etc) is unhindered.
  • The CBC is funded by Canadian tax payers.

Would the Canadian ISPs dare to continue to cripple BitTorrent traffic, even if the packets of said traffic belong to a video made available by a publicly funded television network? Michael Geist points out that the CBC’s Mandate clearly states that their programming:

…be made available throughout Canada by the most appropriate and efficient means and as resources become available for the purpose…

In terms of the distribution of “large” digital content like high-quality video on the Internet, nothing currently comes close the appropriateness and efficiency of BitTorrent. Hopefully this experiement is successful and ISPs have no choice but to respond by providing equal accessibility to all information available on the Internet.

Even though earlier this year I complained about the CBC showing too many Leafs games, they’re still not off the hook. Although I am viewing them in a much more favourable light. 🙂

Geek Aside:
To get around some of the traffic shaping, I suggest using non-standard ports with your chosen BitTorrent client (I use µTorrent for Windows and Deluge for Linux) and changing the associated port forwarding on your NAT router, if you have one (and you should). For fun, I often change which port I use on a weekly basis. Also, some clients are better at obscuring BitTorrent packets from traffic-shaping hardware/software than others – Deluge’s default settings rule for this.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)
comments: 0 »

psssst, hey, wanna watch a movie?

May 2, 2007 under digg, DRM, HD DVD

So I wake up this morning (like I do every morning, thankfully) and fire up Google Reader to see all of the news that missed while I slept. Lo and behold, people were busy on Digg. It turns out that Digg users are upset with the fact that the HD DVD Promotion Group sponsors Digg founder Kevin Rose’s Diggnation video podcast. In protest en masse, users posted the hexadecimal value that is used to decrypt the DRM scheme on HD-DVD discs. Said hex number is 09-F9-11-02-9D-74-E3-5B-D8-41-56-C5-63-56-88-C0, 1.32562788879895E+37 in decimal. I believe that media that I buy should be mine to do with what I want – I’d like to think I’m purchasing and not renting. That’s the reason why I’m joining the crowd in posting the value, but…

Anybody who believes this effectively kills the encryption on HD-DVDs is totally wrong, obviously; they’ll just use a different hex value for future discs. The part that leaves me scratching my head is how did they, the HD DVD Promotion Group, come to the conclusion that a single 128-bit value is sufficient to prevent hackers from cracking this.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)
comments: 2 »